|
Post by blackfeather on Nov 4, 2016 1:59:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Nov 4, 2016 2:30:37 GMT
blackfeather, Since when does Wikileaks have hillary's emails? They hacked Podesta's, not hillary's. The twitter page overshadowing the wikileaks page doesn't make it the official Wikileaks site. When you X the twitter page off, the Wikileaks page has nothing about any child trafficking. Hoax?
|
|
|
Post by sawmilljim on Nov 4, 2016 16:26:30 GMT
blackfeather , Since when does Wikileaks have hillary's emails? They hacked Podesta's, not hillary's. The twitter page overshadowing the wikileaks page doesn't make it the official Wikileaks site. When you X the twitter page off, the Wikileaks page has nothing about any child trafficking. Hoax? Depends on if you believe the old story where there is smoke there might be some fire . It appears to be everywhere except web sites meeting somes approval . Some appear to be leaks from the NYPD investigation others other appear to be from Wikileaks . Warning not Fox news ! www.anonews.co/fbi-clinton/ By: yournewswire.com An FBI source has confirmed that evidence has emerged from the Clinton email investigation that a massive child trafficking and pedophile sex ring operates in Washington. According to reports, at least 6 members of Congress and several leaders from federal agencies are implicated in the pedophile ring, which they say was run directly with the Clinton Foundation as a front.
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Nov 4, 2016 19:07:05 GMT
sawmilljim , See, there's the problem with these conspiracy rumors, it's called "confirmation bias". It's the tendency to latch onto anything that confirms what a person wants to believe, no matter the source. Just read the weasel words - "an FBI source" "according to reports" "they say". What in the heck does this mean? "which they say was run directly with the Clinton Foundation as a front". Directly by whom they don't say. Anonymous, a very sketchy bunch of internet vandals, says the clintons flew on epstien's plane, and epstien is a pedophile, so they must be too. One of the commenters says hillary "has a well documented predilection for underage girls". What documentation, some other screwball site? They further say several members of Congress and leaders in agencies are involved, but they don't say the clintons are. That's left for people who want to believe it to infer. The clintons are low life scum, but pedophiles? That "smoke" people are seeing is steam coming off a cesspool.
|
|
|
Post by sawmilljim on Nov 4, 2016 22:03:05 GMT
Well it would appear if one was on Epstein's plane going to his private island over 20 times knowing the nickname of the plane and island it weren't no yoga convention . Also if one looks there is good verification Bill snuck away from his SS agents . You don't have to rely on one lumber yard to build a house one can get a board here and there till it all adds up. Information is a lot like that then after time it all either comes together or it don't.
Thing many won't get is all mainstream US news is controlled they don't put out much unless it is pre approved by the Clinton machine . The below report now has 593,173 views maybe some don't rely on the Govt. propaganda news.
NYPD BLOWS WHISTLE ON HILLARY EMAILS: CHILD SEX CRIMES, EXPLOITATION, PAY TO PLAY, PERJURY
|
|
|
Post by blackfeather on Nov 5, 2016 0:24:31 GMT
blackfeather , Since when does Wikileaks have hillary's emails? They hacked Podesta's, not hillary's. The twitter page overshadowing the wikileaks page doesn't make it the official Wikileaks site. When you X the twitter page off, the Wikileaks page has nothing about any child trafficking. Hoax? Feel free to check the links, Hillary was assisting a woman who others thought she was jeopardizing the children's safety. The fear was that although some of the children may have ended up in acceptable homes, some may have not, and the woman in question was at the very least negligent in her actions, and as other's felt she was criminal in her actions. The woman was stopped before any damage could be done. Make of it what you will. Oh, the emails were released not from Podesta's stuff but publicly released by the State Department.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny D on Nov 5, 2016 0:36:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Thtwudbeme on Nov 5, 2016 0:45:27 GMT
Ohhhhh! Uggggggghhhhh! Quick.... Brain Bleach!!!! Those two words should never be used together (I can't even bear to write them in the same sentence). You should know better than that!
|
|
|
Post by Johnny D on Nov 5, 2016 1:06:44 GMT
What makes this unbelievable is that if this were true you would think a secret service man would have exposed them regardless of the consequences.
|
|
|
Post by Thtwudbeme on Nov 5, 2016 1:14:42 GMT
What makes this unbelievable is that if this were true you would think a secret service man would have exposed them regardless of the consequences. You'd be surprised what the Secret Service sees and hears on a daily basis that never sees the light of day.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny D on Nov 5, 2016 1:18:49 GMT
What makes this unbelievable is that if this were true you would think a secret service man would have exposed them regardless of the consequences. You'd be surprised what the Secret Service sees and hears on a daily basis that never sees the light of day. If they saw this and did not publicize then they are worse criminals than the Clintons
|
|
|
Post by Thtwudbeme on Nov 5, 2016 1:28:20 GMT
You'd be surprised what the Secret Service sees and hears on a daily basis that never sees the light of day. If they saw this and did not publicize then they are worse criminals than the Clintons It takes a ballsy person to throw their entire career and livelihood away, especially if they have a family. Not much call (yet) for someone that can shoot fairly accurately, stand against a wall most of the day and spend the other part of the day memorizing the faces of every whacko that has ever written a nasty letter to the White House. Not to mention that most of the similar jobs are all controlled by those you just ratted out.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny D on Nov 5, 2016 1:49:15 GMT
OK got on the tin foil and off to youtubes to verify this report
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Nov 5, 2016 1:51:23 GMT
blackfeather , Since when does Wikileaks have hillary's emails? They hacked Podesta's, not hillary's. The twitter page overshadowing the wikileaks page doesn't make it the official Wikileaks site. When you X the twitter page off, the Wikileaks page has nothing about any child trafficking. Hoax? Feel free to check the links, Hillary was assisting a woman who others thought she was jeopardizing the children's safety. The fear was that although some of the children may have ended up in acceptable homes, some may have not, and the woman in question was at the very least negligent in her actions, and as other's felt she was criminal in her actions. The woman was stopped before any damage could be done. Make of it what you will. Oh, the emails were released not from Podesta's stuff but publicly released by the State Department. Give me a break, will ya? The insinuation of the OP was hillary was involved in "child trafficing". Now the explanation is she was "helping a woman" who placed children in acceptable homes, but some might not have been. Then we're told "others felt" she was criminal in her actions. What others? If the emails came from the State Department, why were they presented here as just discovered evidence coming from Wikileaks? Then defended as proof of a perverted conspiracy. Why is it with conspiracy theories whenever they're examined with logic the theory starts to change? Maybe because they were BS to begin with?
|
|
|
Post by Johnny D on Nov 5, 2016 2:05:33 GMT
Busted .... now we know why the Clintons had a private server !!!!
|
|