|
Post by DEKE on Jul 25, 2017 1:15:15 GMT
My two statements are perfectly clear responses to your two opinionated statements. 99.9% of people would be perfectly happy with my statements, but not you, of course, and accept them as my informed opinions. I noticed that you, at first, liked my post, but then you removed your like. I guess you are not as perfect as you thought, huh? You know, Satan thinks he is perfect too, but he is not only wrong, he is insane. Just something you may want to consider. If you want to explain how you think my statements are not logical, have at it, but you will fail. 1. 93.47% of all internet cited statistics are made up 2. my perfection? Good one. That's right out of the 7th grade play book. As long as you're 12, you're doing just fine. 3. Nope, I'm not going to waste time helping you. You'll just argue and when cornered go down mindless rat hole arguments, see your perfection comments above. You might do better studying on your own. The lesson might have a better chance at sinking in. If you understood education better, you would be aware of that.
|
|
|
Post by 7thswan on Jul 25, 2017 1:16:55 GMT
I certainly agree on that. Most people also don't have the time to thoroughly digest all of the available material and do their own independent research of the primary sources, scientific data, and evidence (much of which is missing or compromised in the case of the JFK assassination).... I agree, but most of the experts are reluctant to make public pronouncements or write books about topics like anthropogenic global warming, 9/11, or the JFK assassination, because they are fearful that they will be ostracized by the scientific/medical/engineering communities upon which they are dependent for earning a living. In both of your statements above, you use circular logic. Can you spot the circular logic? Circular logic is faulty logic. Circular logic often happens, as in this case, when someone is blind to their own intense biases. Your other two posts are filled with Area 51 nut jobbery. Not worth my time to respond in a meaningful fashion. deke, why would a person think that the gov. does not kill people? In other words,,, why would anyone trust the government? and another word, what is the bounus to trusting/beliving the gov?
|
|
|
Post by DEKE on Jul 25, 2017 1:21:59 GMT
In both of your statements above, you use circular logic. Can you spot the circular logic? Circular logic is faulty logic. Circular logic often happens, as in this case, when someone is blind to their own intense biases. Your other two posts are filled with Area 51 nut jobbery. Not worth my time to respond in a meaningful fashion. deke, why would a person think that the gov. does not kill people? In other words,,, why would anyone trust the government? and another word, what is the bounus to trusting/beliving the gov? I don't know. Why do you think I would know why some people think the gov does not kill people? And what makes you think that there are people who think the gov does not kill people?
|
|
|
Post by sawmilljim on Jul 25, 2017 1:32:17 GMT
I think I was about 30 years old when I figured out who was behind killing Kennedy. I was working at Radio Shack and some guy paid me with money but it didn't say federal reserve note on the cash it said it was a sliver certificate. The year on the bill was 1963. Kennedy took back the right to issue money and cut the Federal reserve out of it. All the Agatha Christie books I have read, it is either love or money that is the cause of murder. I doubt it was love in this case but who got to control the money of the U.S. Interestingly, Johnson, one of his first acts was to give back money printing to the Fed. I'm sure a lot of people wanted him dead but I can guess who financed the assassination. Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2017 1:51:22 GMT
My two statements are perfectly clear responses to your two opinionated statements. 99.9% of people would be perfectly happy with my statements, but not you, of course, and accept them as my informed opinions. I noticed that you, at first, liked my post, but then you removed your like. I guess you are not as perfect as you thought, huh? You know, Satan thinks he is perfect too, but he is not only wrong, he is insane. Just something you may want to consider. If you want to explain how you think my statements are not logical, have at it, but you will fail. 1. 93.47% of all internet cited statistics are made up 2. my perfection? Good one. That's right out of the 7th grade play book. As long as you're 12, you're doing just fine. 3. Nope, I'm not going to waste time helping you. You'll just argue and when cornered go down mindless rat hole arguments, see your perfection comments above. You might do better studying on your own. The lesson might have a better chance at sinking in. If you understood education better, you would be aware of that. We were never having a formal debate. Your opinions, such as they are, are yours and my informed opinions (a belief, judgment or way of thinking about something based on information) are mine. That is all there is to it.
""Then children were brought to him that he might lay his hands on them and pray. The disciples rebuked the people, but Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.” And he laid his hands on them and went away."-Matthew 19:13-15, Holy Bible, English Standard Version (ESV)
"The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them."-Isaiah 11:6, Holy Bible, English Standard Version (ESV)
"And calling to him a child, he put him in the midst of them and said, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.""-Matthew 18:2-4, Holy Bible, English Standard Version (ESV)
|
|
|
Post by DEKE on Jul 25, 2017 2:40:36 GMT
LOL
You say that's all there is to it and then you come back to add irrelevant bible verses you don't understand. Good job!
It sounds like you are comparing yourself to a child and me to God. Stop it. You're embarrassing me. But I can see why it might seem that way to you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2017 3:21:13 GMT
LOL You say that's all there is to it and then you come back to add irrelevant bible verses you don't understand. Good job! It sounds like you are comparing yourself to a child and me to God. Stop it. You're embarrassing me. But I can see why it might seem that way to you. Not quite, but if you give it some thought, perhaps you will see.
|
|
|
Post by blackfeather on Jul 25, 2017 15:26:26 GMT
@headlesshorseman, have you ever noticed it always seem to be a certain person you end up arguing with, it looks like he is out gunning for you. I have noticed in the middle of unrelated threads he will throw an insult at you, confirming my suspicion. Learn to walk away. One of the most effective things I learned in school was to ignore people. There was this kid who was a thorn in every-bodies side so one day we all decided to ignore him as if he didn't exist. It was surprising how miserable he ended up when everyone just ignored him. So when someone is out to gun for you, ignore it. They are the ones with a problem, don't get sucked into their problem lest you end up like them. The only Biblical reason to answer them is for the audience's sake so they aren't led astray. In this case there is no worry of that.
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Jul 26, 2017 2:27:16 GMT
There has to be a least a hundred books on the JFK assassination, most of them written by people who have read, and incorporated those other books. I've read that Oswald's shots couldn't have been possible, while others have run tests proving they were. I saw a demonstration proving the back of Kennedy's head blew off from a shot from behind, due to hydraulic forces, while others swear only a frontal shot could do it. The one? two? three? guys on the grassy knoll were hit men from Marsailles, or CIA agents, or both.
It's all good fodder for distracted conversation, people are going to believe what they want, no matter whose "expert" they discount. Theories about "banksters", "CIA assassins", "mafia hit men", "Soviet infiltrators", are a dime a dozen. In my opinion, only Oswald knew, or maybe he didn't.
|
|
|
Post by sawmilljim on Jul 26, 2017 4:26:43 GMT
There has to be a least a hundred books on the JFK assassination, most of them written by people who have read, and incorporated those other books. I've read that Oswald's shots couldn't have been possible, while others have run tests proving they were. I saw a demonstration proving the back of Kennedy's head blew off from a shot from behind, due to hydraulic forces, while others swear only a frontal shot could do it. The one? two? three? guys on the grassy knoll were hit men from Marsailles, or CIA agents, or both. It's all good fodder for distracted conversation, people are going to believe what they want, no matter whose "expert" they discount. Theories about "banksters", "CIA assassins", "mafia hit men", "Soviet infiltrators", are a dime a dozen. In my opinion, only Oswald knew, or maybe he didn't. IMHO Oswald was a useful idiot if he didn't fire the shot and a good shot with a old gun and twenty dollar scope that didn't use modern gunpowder ! Recent Photos From the National Archives Prove: Lee Harvey Oswald was Framed
|
|
|
Post by DEKE on Jul 26, 2017 14:03:37 GMT
There has to be a least a hundred books on the JFK assassination, exactly. and many of them have conflicting theories as to the who and why of the conspiracy. But you never see one of the conspiracy nuts knocking down a single theory. They can't all be true.
|
|