|
Post by sunny225 on Mar 23, 2024 14:09:20 GMT
And I just saw this regarding ivermectin: www.theepochtimes.com/health/ivermectin-could-be-a-powerful-drug-for-fighting-cancer-heres-why-5585682?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=BonginoReportIvermectin Could Be a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer, Here’s Why Different from many conventional cancer therapies, ivermectin kills cancer cells by enhancing immune response. March 22, 2024 Rick Alderson was a retired sawmill worker who was diagnosed with terminal colon cancer in November 2020. He experienced excruciating pain in his bowels for months; then, a gastroenterologist found a large tumor in his rectum and told him and his wife he only had six months to live. Rick Alderson and his wife, Eve Alderson, after Mr. Alderson developed colon cancer. (Courtesy of Joshua Treadway) To the oncologist, Mr. Alderson “was a dead man walking,” Mr. Alderson’s wife, Eve Alderson, told The Epoch Times. Doctors were against starting him on treatment due to Mr. Alderson’s age and the severity of his cancer, but Mr. and Mrs. Alderson determined that their fate was in God’s hands and decided to do whatever they could. Mr. Alderson got started with 10 rounds of radiation therapy. Initially, his carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a marker for tumor activity, was significantly elevated at 480 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). A month later, he started chemotherapy. By then, his CEA levels had risen to 1,498 ng/mL. more at link
|
|
|
Post by woolybear on Mar 23, 2024 14:26:09 GMT
When the virus first started and ivermec was suggested as a treatment I went to the feed store and got a couple tubes of the horse paste to keep on hand. I've not had to resort to it...yet. I copied this from somewhere on the internet. Use it at your own discretion. IVOMEC DOSAGE FOR COVID Ivermectin is a key factor in the alliance’s I-MASK+ protocol for prophylaxis and early treatment of outpatients with COVID-19. In the protocol, those at high risk for COVID-19 infection receive ivermectin at 0.2 mg/kg (for 180 pounds that is 16.4 mg.) on day 1 and day 3, and weekly for 4 weeks; those who were exposed to COVID-19 receive the same dose at day 1 and day 3; and both groups receive daily doses of vitamin D3, vitamin C, quercetin, zinc and melatonin. For early outpatients with COVID-19, the protocol calls for one dose of ivermectin at 0.2 mg/kg at day 1 and day 3, along with the same daily vitamins and 325 mg per day of aspirin. Ivermectin Horse Paste comes in syringes which contain 6.08 grams total weight. The paste in the syringe is 1.87% ivermectin. 6.08 grams x .0187% = 0.11 grams of ivermectin 0.11 grams = 110 mg (milligrams) 110 mg divided by 0.09 mg/lb = 1,222 pounds So one syringe of horse paste is enough to treat 1,222 pounds! That’s why the ivermectin horse paste packages say “Contents will treat up to 1250 lb body weight”. So I could use the ring on the syringe’s plunger to measure my dose exactly as is done for a horse!
A study that I download from somewhere. I don't foot note things because they are for my own use IVERMECTIN FOR COVID Methods: The double-blinded trial compared patients receiving ivermectin 0·2 mg/kg for 3 days vs. placebo in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab was obtained at recruitment and then every two days. Primary endpoint was reduction of viral-load on the 6th day (third day after termination of treatment) as reflected by Ct level>30 (non-infectious level). The primary outcome was supported by determination of viral culture viability
Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad spectrum anti-parasitic agent, which was initially approved in humans in 1987 to treat onchocerciasis, awarding the discoverers the Nobel prize of Medicine in 2015. Its main activity was known for therapy against infections caused by roundworm parasites. Over the years, the spectrum was extended and included also parasitic skin infections such as scabies among others.[1] In the last decade, several in-vitro studies have shown its anti-viral activity against a broad range of viruses, mainly RNA viruses including HIV, influenza and several flaviviruses such as Dengue virus (DENV), Zika, and West Nile Virus.[2-6] Recently ivermectin was tested in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 and showed ~5000-fold reduction (99.8%) in viral RNA after 48 hours.[7] However, it was criticized that the dosing used in the study cannot be achieved with the current approved dose.[8] In addition, ivermectin has anti-inflammatory properties.[9] Since theexcessive inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 is thought to be a major cause of disease severity and death in patients with COVID-19,[10] ivermectin may have further value in addition to its anti-viral properties. With its high safety profile, ivermectin is a potential treatment against COVID-19 in its different stages. Some clinical studies have shown beneficial results regarding clinical outcomes and the length of viral shedding, however most of them are lacking a high standard of rigorous methodology.[11] Here we conducted a double blinded randomized control trial to assess whether Ivermectin can shorten viral shedding, in non-hospitalized patients at the early stage of COVID-19 infection. Patients assigned to the intervention arm received ivermectin in a dosage regimen according to body weight; patients weighing between 40-69 kg received four tablets (=12mg) daily and patients weighing ≥70kg received five tablets (=15mg) daily, all for three days. Patients assigned to the placebo arm received the same number and same appearance of pills per weight daily, for three days. They were guided to take the pills one hour before a meal. The investigators and patients were blinded to the assignment.
|
|
|
Post by farmrbrown on Mar 23, 2024 23:23:29 GMT
When the virus first started and ivermec was suggested as a treatment I went to the feed store and got a couple tubes of the horse paste to keep on hand. I've not had to resort to it...yet. I copied this from somewhere on the internet. Use it at your own discretion. IVOMEC DOSAGE FOR COVID Ivermectin is a key factor in the alliance’s I-MASK+ protocol for prophylaxis and early treatment of outpatients with COVID-19. In the protocol, those at high risk for COVID-19 infection receive ivermectin at 0.2 mg/kg (for 180 pounds that is 16.4 mg.) on day 1 and day 3, and weekly for 4 weeks; those who were exposed to COVID-19 receive the same dose at day 1 and day 3; and both groups receive daily doses of vitamin D3, vitamin C, quercetin, zinc and melatonin. For early outpatients with COVID-19, the protocol calls for one dose of ivermectin at 0.2 mg/kg at day 1 and day 3, along with the same daily vitamins and 325 mg per day of aspirin. Ivermectin Horse Paste comes in syringes which contain 6.08 grams total weight. The paste in the syringe is 1.87% ivermectin. 6.08 grams x .0187% = 0.11 grams of ivermectin 0.11 grams = 110 mg (milligrams) 110 mg divided by 0.09 mg/lb = 1,222 pounds So one syringe of horse paste is enough to treat 1,222 pounds! That’s why the ivermectin horse paste packages say “Contents will treat up to 1250 lb body weight”. So I could use the ring on the syringe’s plunger to measure my dose exactly as is done for a horse! A study that I download from somewhere. I don't foot note things because they are for my own use IVERMECTIN FOR COVID Methods: The double-blinded trial compared patients receiving ivermectin 0·2 mg/kg for 3 days vs. placebo in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab was obtained at recruitment and then every two days. Primary endpoint was reduction of viral-load on the 6th day (third day after termination of treatment) as reflected by Ct level>30 (non-infectious level). The primary outcome was supported by determination of viral culture viability Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad spectrum anti-parasitic agent, which was initially approved in humans in 1987 to treat onchocerciasis, awarding the discoverers the Nobel prize of Medicine in 2015. Its main activity was known for therapy against infections caused by roundworm parasites. Over the years, the spectrum was extended and included also parasitic skin infections such as scabies among others.[1] In the last decade, several in-vitro studies have shown its anti-viral activity against a broad range of viruses, mainly RNA viruses including HIV, influenza and several flaviviruses such as Dengue virus (DENV), Zika, and West Nile Virus.[2-6] Recently ivermectin was tested in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 and showed ~5000-fold reduction (99.8%) in viral RNA after 48 hours.[7] However, it was criticized that the dosing used in the study cannot be achieved with the current approved dose.[8] In addition, ivermectin has anti-inflammatory properties.[9] Since theexcessive inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 is thought to be a major cause of disease severity and death in patients with COVID-19,[10] ivermectin may have further value in addition to its anti-viral properties. With its high safety profile, ivermectin is a potential treatment against COVID-19 in its different stages. Some clinical studies have shown beneficial results regarding clinical outcomes and the length of viral shedding, however most of them are lacking a high standard of rigorous methodology.[11] Here we conducted a double blinded randomized control trial to assess whether Ivermectin can shorten viral shedding, in non-hospitalized patients at the early stage of COVID-19 infection. Patients assigned to the intervention arm received ivermectin in a dosage regimen according to body weight; patients weighing between 40-69 kg received four tablets (=12mg) daily and patients weighing ≥70kg received five tablets (=15mg) daily, all for three days. Patients assigned to the placebo arm received the same number and same appearance of pills per weight daily, for three days. They were guided to take the pills one hour before a meal. The investigators and patients were blinded to the assignment. Exactly. Why would anyone listen to the "experts" that say it isn't for humans, when it was approved for humans in 1987?!Regarding the 2nd quote above, if the "current approved dose" isn't effective and you have the ability to adjust the dosage yourself and use it safely, what the heck is the problem? I'm supposed to wait for some guy to come along and give me an extra squirt or cut a extra pill in half for me so I can swallow it? Dang it. I know I've said it before but, I may look dumb, but it's just a disguise! lol On a more scientific note, those RNA viruses mentioned were the backbone of the research on MERS, SARS and COVID-19. IOW, the relationship between them, how they act and how they react to treatments is HIGHLY relative. Don't be deceived, people.
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Mar 23, 2024 23:39:52 GMT
Back in, I think it was early 2021, I got a notice on my admin board from ProBoards. It basically said any "misinformation" regarding Covid-19 would be regarded as an abuse of their terms of service.
I sent back a question: We'll be happy as a ProBoards community to abide by this notice. However, we're not sure which "misinformation" we shouldn't post. Should it be Dr Fauci's recommendations of last month, or his pronouncements last week, or what we read today? They seem to be contradictory, and rather vague as to the tests conducted to give veracity to whichever one we might choose. Your assistance in this matter will be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Ozarks Tom. Never heard back from them.
|
|
|
Post by Tricky Grama on Mar 24, 2024 12:40:59 GMT
Back in, I think it was early 2021, I got a notice on my admin board from ProBoards. It basically said any "misinformation" regarding Covid-19 would be regarded as an abuse of their terms of service. I sent back a question: We'll be happy as a ProBoards community to abide by this notice. However, we're not sure which "misinformation" we shouldn't post. Should it be Dr Fauci's recommendations of last month, or his pronouncements last week, or what we read today? They seem to be contradictory, and rather vague as to the tests conducted to give veracity to whichever one we might choose. Your assistance in this matter will be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Ozarks Tom. Never heard back from them. I LOVE it!
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Mar 24, 2024 22:30:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Mar 25, 2024 2:32:56 GMT
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/fda-admits-covid-vaccine-leads-significiantly-elevated-risk/FDA Admits COVID Vaccine Leads to ‘Significiantly Elevated’ Risk of Seizure in Toddlers Toddlers and young children are at a “significantly elevated” risk of seizure after taking the COVID-19 vaccine, according to the latest research by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Researchers found that children experienced a 2.5-fold increase in febrile seizures within 24 hours of receiving a Moderna shot compared to the same children between eight to 63 days post-vaccination. There were 88 febrile seizures after the Pfizer vaccination among the study group. The report states: In this self-controlled case series that included participants aged 2-5 years from three commercial insurance databases, the incidence rate ratio of febrile seizures was significantly elevated in the 0-1 days following mRNA-1273 administration. Absolute risk was small. The incidence of febrile seizures was elevated immediately following vaccination with the monovalent mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine in children aged 2-5 years. Based on the current body of evidence, the safety profile of monovalent mRNA vaccines remains favorable for use in young children. The findings raise further concerns about the various vaccines, which have led to a variety of serious side effects despite being touted by the medical establishment as “safe and effective.” Last year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) added the COVID-19 vaccine to the routine immunization schedule for both children and adolescents, meaning it will delivered to millions of children and young people. It is commonly accepted that COVID-19 does not pose a significant threat to young people. more at link
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Mar 31, 2024 23:39:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Apr 2, 2024 20:35:52 GMT
www.commondreams.org/opinion/covid-19-gain-of-function-us-researchWhat Might the US Owe the World for Covid-19? A US-funded laboratory origin of Covid-19 would certainly constitute the most significant case of governmental gross negligence in history. The people of the world deserve transparency and factual answers on vital questions. The US government (USG) funded and supported a program of dangerous laboratory research that may have resulted in the creation and accidental laboratory release of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused the Covid-19 pandemic. Following the outbreak, the USG lied in order to cover up its possible role. The US Government should correct the lies, find the facts, and make amends with the rest of the world. A group of intrepid truth-seekers—journalists, scientists, whistleblowers—have uncovered a vast amount of information pointing to the likely laboratory origin of SARS-CoV-2. Most important has been the intrepid work of the The Intercept and US Right to Know (USRTK), especially investigative reporter Emily Kopp at USRTK. Based on this investigative work, the Republican-led House Committee on Oversight and Accountability is now carrying out an important investigation in a Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. In the Senate, the leading voice for transparency, honesty, and reason in investigating the origin of SARS-Cov-2 has been Republican Senator Rand Paul. The evidence of a possible laboratory creation revolves around a multi-year US-led research program that involved US and Chinese scientists. The research was designed by US scientists, funded mainly by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense, and administered by a US organization, the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), with much of the work taking place at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). more at link
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Apr 3, 2024 0:23:58 GMT
Although the author is correct in pointing to the involvement of the NIH/CDC in the development of the virus, he skips past the very real possibility that its release into the public was accidental and not used as a weapon against this country, especially during an election year when their most hated President could be brought down with the virus's effects.
And what amounts to "reparations"? Nope.
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Apr 5, 2024 0:15:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Apr 5, 2024 0:22:30 GMT
vigilantnews.com/post/ed-dowd-identifies-new-problem-in-cancer-trends/Ed Dowd Identifies Disturbing Problem in Cancer Trends “We found something interesting.” FEATUREDEd Dowd Identifies Disturbing Problem in Cancer Trends “We found something interesting.” Data analyst Edward Dowd appeared on the Dr. Drew show Wednesday and unveiled startling data that points to a significant and troubling rise in cancer deaths. The latest report from Phinace Technologies, authored by Carlos Alegria and Yuri Nunes, uncovers a disturbing trend in cancer deaths among elderly people following the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, specifically in the 75 to 84 age group. “There was no signal in 2020,” Dowd told Dr. Kelly Victory, a board-certified trauma and emergency specialist with over 30 years of clinical experience. However, there was a “clear deviation” in 2021 and 2022. more at link
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Apr 5, 2024 21:17:44 GMT
naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dr-james-thorp-shedding-is-real-per?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=676930&post_id=143264409&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=9atnc&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=emailDr James Thorp: "Shedding" is Real, Per Study; DNA Damage to Unborn is Real The Last US Maternal-Fetal Medicine Specialist with Integrity, Presents a Terrifying New Study I interview here Dr James Thorp. He is the distinguished maternal-fetal medicine specialist, who is one of the only members of the entire US OB/GYN or midwife community in the US, to speak up on behalf of his patients, or on behalf of pregnant women and babies, born and unborn, in general, regarding the damage to women and babies from the mRNA injection. Dr Thorp, along with two other independent midwives, was among the only health professionals working with pregnant women and new moms, to warn about the damage that the lipid nanoparticles in the mRNA injections, were causing to the placentas of pregnant women. Dr Thorp had earlier shown me images of sonograms revealing calcifications throughout mRNA-vaccinated mothers’ placentas. These calcifications restricted nutrients and oxygen from reaching the baby in utero. Dr Thorp also warned me early on - in 2022 — that premature deliveries were on the rise among vaccinated women, as their placentas could not grow normally. Both of these conditions were confirmed independently to me by two unrelated midwives, in Central and Northern California; one was anonymous, and one is named Ellen Jasmer, of the Sierra Natural Birth Center. Ellen Jasmer showed me photographic images of discolored, shrunken, flattened placentas that she and her colleagues are now seeing in their practice. more with video at link
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Apr 7, 2024 1:33:49 GMT
usawatchdog.com/fda-cdc-destroyed-ivermectin-to-inject-cv19-bioweapon-vax-dr-pierre-kory/FDA & CDC Destroyed Ivermectin to Inject CV19 Bioweapon Vax – Dr. Pierre Kory World renowned CV19 critical care and pulmonary expert Dr. Pierre Kory was one of the first to call for Ivermectin to treat Covid in the early days of the pandemic. Instead of using Ivermectin, the FDA and CDC vilified the drug and questioned its effectiveness even though Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize for safety and efficacy in 2015. Because of these actions from the FDA and CDC, people died in the hundreds of thousands in America alone for lack of treatment from a cheap and effective drug to treat Covid. Dr. Kory thinks he knows what happened and explains, “The FDA kicked it off with a tweet, you know the one that said, ‘You are not a horse, you are not a cow. Stop it y’all.”. . . . That horse dewormer campaign is my strongly held belief that was a professional public relations campaign to denigrate Ivermectin. . . . That campaign was around August 21, 2021. That tweet (“stop it, y’all”) was released after a report that showed 90,000 prescriptions of Ivermectin were being filled every week in the US. . . . I think Big Pharma saw Ivermectin was being used heavily, and they were afraid of the direct experience with physicians and patients such as word of mouth like ‘Hey, my doc gave me Ivermectin, and I was better in 24 hours.’ So, they had to put a stop to the use of it. They loaded up the bazookas and started a war. . . .” As a result of the assassination of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Dr. Kory says, “Hundreds of thousands died for lack of early treatment of Covid in the US, and millions died worldwide.” The FDA was sued by Kory and other doctors and the FDA recently agreed to retract all the untrue negative information it put out trashing Ivermectin. Why kill Ivermectin and then later HCQ? Dr. Kory says, “It’s so simple. Number one, it would have threatened the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the CV19 vaccine. You cannot do an EUA for a vaccine if there is a safe and effective treatment for Covid. I think Ivermectin threatened the global market for the CV19 vaccines. If Ivermectin was effective (and it was very effective on Covid), what would be the uptake for these vaccines? They would plummet, and they knew it would destroy the market. Over a few years, it’s north of $100 billion. . . . Then comes little old Ivermectin, and it costs 6 cents a pill to make. . . . It was one of the solutions to the pandemic. The pandemic would have been over if everybody was on Ivermectin, and that is why they had to destroy it.” What we got was a CV19 “vaccine” that Dr. Kory says, “It did not help a single person.” Dr. Kory goes on to say, “It did the opposite of helping get people well. It was sold to the world’s population on a campaign of fear. They said ‘get vaccinated or you are going to die from Covid.’ The medical establishment conditioned everyone’s brain to believe that the most important thing for their life is that they don’t die of Covid.” more at link
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Apr 9, 2024 20:05:39 GMT
kunstler.com/podcast/kunstlercast-398-dr-geert-vanden-bossche-and-the-coming-acute-crisis-of-covid-among-the-vaccinated/This is an audio podcast with Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche about the coming crisis hitting mostly the vaccinated. Geert Vanden Bossche is a globally renowned virologist working in Belgium. He predicts a “hyper-acute crisis” of Covid-19 illness among highly-vaccinated populations emerging shortly across the world. He argues that scientists and politicians have turned a natural viral pandemic into a crisis of disastrous immune escape. The author’s arguments are compelling and indicate that Nature will correct this mistake, but at a substantial cost to human lives in highly-vaccinated countries. He is the author of The inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic. Dr. Vanden Bossche’s papers and talks can be found at the Website Voice for Science and Solidarity dot org.
|
|