|
Post by blackfeather on Mar 8, 2024 18:29:49 GMT
Any war between NATO and Russia, NATO will lose. Why, the west has forsaken God, The Russians are rediscovering God. Just look at the civil war, The south continued to defeat the North battle after battle, they gave God the credit, prayed before battle and so on. It was only after Lincoln declared a nationwide day of prayer and fasting did the first victory by Grant take place. It appears God's plan was for a powerful America, but until the north recognized him, re-establishing the union was not going to happen. Unless the west turns back to God, they cannot win in a NATO-Russian war.
This election is going to be critical for NATO, if the United States is embroiled in election drama with no clear winner, or a winner who is powerless, this may encourage Europe to go it alone, either taking control of NATO away from America if they can, or degrading the importance of NATO, in favor of their own military alliance. If we appear to be lacking leadership, or in downright turmoil, Europe or at least major parts of Europe will abandon us. The whole Russia, Russia Russia, thing has them all scared that they have to take action with or without the United States. Watch Germany.
|
|
|
Post by farmgirl on Mar 8, 2024 19:58:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by farmgirl on Mar 8, 2024 19:59:13 GMT
Any war between NATO and Russia, NATO will lose. Why, the west has forsaken God, The Russians are rediscovering God. Just look at the civil war, The south continued to defeat the North battle after battle, they gave God the credit, prayed before battle and so on. It was only after Lincoln declared a nationwide day of prayer and fasting did the first victory by Grant take place. It appears God's plan was for a powerful America, but until the north recognized him, re-establishing the union was not going to happen. Unless the west turns back to God, they cannot win in a NATO-Russian war. This election is going to be critical for NATO, if the United States is embroiled in election drama with no clear winner, or a winner who is powerless, this may encourage Europe to go it alone, either taking control of NATO away from America if they can, or degrading the importance of NATO, in favor of their own military alliance. If we appear to be lacking leadership, or in downright turmoil, Europe or at least major parts of Europe will abandon us. The whole Russia, Russia Russia, thing has them all scared that they have to take action with or without the United States. Watch Germany. In any war between Russia and NATO, everyone loses. Putin has said this several times.
|
|
|
Post by farmgirl on Mar 9, 2024 3:09:48 GMT
Not good. One wrong move...
|
|
|
Post by fordy on Mar 9, 2024 3:24:59 GMT
...............Was watching a video on extending the range\accuracy of 500 , 1,000 , 2,000 conventional bombs ! The Airforce now has a kit with a small jet engine that extends the range for the 2,000lb. bomb to 300 miles ! ...............Also , I believe it can carry a nuke for the same distance ! The Navy has versions of the airforce extended range kits that can recognize ships and attack them after they have been released by Naval aircraft ! , fordy
|
|
|
Post by BrewDaddy on Mar 9, 2024 3:46:40 GMT
Not good. One wrong move... Good thing the original twittz isn't from some random guy with a tagline of "Sytheruk (Ben) 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 @sythuk Pharmaceutical Microbiology- British 🇬🇧 -A Fella - Slava Ukraini! 💪🇺🇦 Lover of Orcs things going BOOM💥 in Ukraine. @mriyareport Ukraine will be Free!" Oh wait.... it is... This is fear mongering. bd
|
|
|
Post by farmgirl on Mar 9, 2024 5:10:45 GMT
Not good. One wrong move... Good thing the original twittz isn't from some random guy with a tagline of "Sytheruk (Ben) 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 @sythuk Pharmaceutical Microbiology- British 🇬🇧 -A Fella - Slava Ukraini! 💪🇺🇦 Lover of Orcs things going BOOM💥 in Ukraine. @mriyareport Ukraine will be Free!" Oh wait.... it is... This is fear mongering. bd I have no idea who he is, not someone I even follow on Twitter, it just popped up in my feed. However, I do know several accounts I follow on there are very concerned about the world, meaning Russia/China, and for good reason. Most have a military background. One wrong move could mean very bad news for the world as we know it. I don't live in fear, I'm way past that, but I do try to share the things I think might be important. www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-express.com/news/world-news/130470/nato-f35a-fighter-jet-nuclear-bombs/ampNATO fighter jets get green light to carry nukes as tension with Russia soars The F-35A Joint Strike Fighter has been certified to carry thermonuclear weapons as tensions between Russia and NATO hit a breaking point
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Mar 11, 2024 17:25:25 GMT
ronpaulinstitute.org/did-toria-jump-or-was-she-pushed/Did ‘Toria’ Jump…Or Was She Pushed? by Daniel McAdams | Mar 8, 2024 The sudden retirement announcement by State Department Deputy Secretary for Political Affairs Victoria “Toria” Nuland earlier this week left many US foreign policy watchers – your author included – trying to read the tea leaves to see what was actually going on. There are plenty of theories and speculations as to what motivated someone like Nuland – whose entire professional career seemed to hinge on getting this proxy war on Russia started – to suddenly pack it in and pull out of the game, mid-inning. Especially as the Biden Administration and its supporters still largely claim (in public) that Ukraine can “win” and in fact is winning (with just one more cash infusion from Washington). Who would walk away when your life’s work was just coming to fruition? Does it make any sense? There are many theories. Let’s look at some of them. First theory: Cashing in. A sober Nuland sees the failure of “Project Ukraine” and wants out before it gets too hot in the APC. The neocons are very good at one thing: distancing themselves from their worst disasters in the most timely of manners. Example: all neocons circa 2006: “I never really believed Iraq had WMDs!” In fact neocon Senator Marco Rubio just this week said that he’d always known Ukraine couldn’t win, but, “tried not talk about this publicly because I thought it undermined the leverage that Ukraine had.” So at age 62 with a second Biden term looking very iffy, is Nuland looking to cash in for all her years in “government service” before her brand is tarnished by another Afghanistan-style collapse in Ukraine? There surely are plenty of think tank sinecures available for the likes of Nuland. The money that most Americans believe goes to protect us in the yearly National Defense Authorization bills, in fact to a grotesque degree goes to the Beltway “think tanks” promoting war – and is thereby used to promote…more military spending! My old friend Chuck Spinney’s “self-licking ice cream cone.” Then there are the universities, which bathe luxuriously in government money and in turn return the favor by slavishly supporting the national security state – that money tide that raises all boats. Ask exiled neocon former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul about his charmed life navel-gazing at US government funded Stanford University. Never has anyone so wrong about so much benefitted so massively from it. Theory Two: Nuland didn’t jump, she was pushed. For the past ten years, US policy toward Ukraine has been identified more with Victoria Nuland than perhaps anyone else. Even before that, she was working behind the scenes under Strobe Talbott in the 1990s to, by subterfuge, bring a fractured Russia under Washington’s boot. But she later ended up being the poster-person for the 2014 US-backed coup against the democratically-elected and universally-recognized government in Ukraine. As US-backed thugs shot at the crowd – “friendly fire” – to create the chaos and fury necessary to motivate the protesters to “finish it,” Nuland was right there in their midst cheering them on. She was even famously caught in an intercepted phone call with then-US Ambassador to Kiev Geoff Pyatt actually picking who would staff the post-coup Ukraine government. Imagine if the events of January 6th, 2021, were actually a coup rather than a rowdy protest, and suddenly there emerged on the steps of the US Capitol some of the highest ranking officials from the Chinese Communist Party literally directing the insurrectionists and advising them on how to strike a death-blow to the elected government of the United States. It seems impossible here, but it happened in Ukraine. And none of the US media even bothered to question it. After all, as is attributed to Karl Rove, “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.” The rules do not apply to us.
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Mar 11, 2024 21:11:24 GMT
Funny, I was just thinking about Nuland today. I was thinking she'll go down in deep state history as the one-woman force that brought the CIA's and State Department's dreams come true in Eastern Europe. I wouldn't doubt there'll be a statue of her somewhere in State.
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Mar 14, 2024 15:24:28 GMT
What good is it to have 3 branches of government when one of them (at least) is not in the game, not relevant? And how does the pentagon take that upon themselves to do? hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2024/03/13/pentagon-giving-ukraine-300-million-without-new-congressional-approval-n3784597Pentagon Giving Ukraine $300 Million Without New Congressional Approval Back in December, the Pentagon announced that they had burned through all of the money designated to supply military aid to Ukraine, so future shipments would have to wait until Congress appropriated more funds. That hasn't happened because the House GOP is insisting that Joe Biden fix our borders before we blow even more cash on those of another country. Now, it would appear that Biden's patience is exhausted because the Pentagon is shipping another $300 million worth of weapons to Ukraine anyway. How are they doing that? They claim to have mysteriously "found some cost savings" in their contracts. But in reality, they've already spent $10 billion more than they were supposed to on Ukraine. So much for oversight, I suppose. (Associated Press) The Pentagon will rush about $300 million in weapons to Ukraine after finding some cost savings in its contracts, even though the military remains deeply overdrawn and needs at least $10 billion to replenish all the weapons it has pulled from its stocks to help Kyiv in its desperate fight against Russia, the White House announced Tuesday. It’s the Pentagon’s first announced security package for Ukraine since December, when it acknowledged it was out of replenishment funds. It wasn’t until recent days that officials publicly acknowledged they weren’t just out of money to buy replacement weapons, they are $10 billion overdrawn. The announcement comes as Ukraine is running dangerously low on munitions and efforts to get fresh funds for weapons have stalled in the House because of Republican opposition. U.S. officials have insisted for months that the United States wouldn’t be able to resume weapons deliveries until Congress provided the additional replenishment funds, which are part of the stalled supplemental spending bill.
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Mar 15, 2024 14:55:17 GMT
Imagine that, they "found" and extra $300 million just laying around. Hmmm, maybe I should go check our seat cushions, no telling what I'd find.
Of course the gratuitous mention of the selfish GOP, as if the border funding wasn't the only leverage they have. The feckless GOP should be shouting from the rooftops about the purposeful damage illegal immigration is doing to our country, but when asked they act like it's purely a political ploy. Nope, it's setting us up for terrorism all over the country. The deaths from drunk driving and assaults will be nothing when the real mayhem starts.
|
|
|
Post by farmgirl on Mar 17, 2024 22:59:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by farmgirl on Mar 17, 2024 23:00:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Mar 18, 2024 0:02:35 GMT
Doggone, Macron sure sounds like a tough guy, maybe his wife will slap some sense into him.
|
|
|
Post by sunny225 on Mar 18, 2024 0:07:56 GMT
Doggone, Macron sure sounds like a tough guy, maybe his wife will slap some sense into him. You mean this... person?
|
|