|
Post by oldvet on Oct 27, 2016 21:01:00 GMT
I don't know about other states but in Arkansas on the first ballot the electors must vote the way the election comes out or they will have a terrible misfortune as their house and Business burned on the same night.
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Oct 27, 2016 21:57:44 GMT
@headlesshorseman, Nobody was surprised Chicago corrupted the '60 election, particularly Chicagoans. Just how is a "paid political announcement" a bribe? Soros didn't say anything about bribing anybody, and unless you have a listening device in his office, you can only guess what he's said. I have no doubt Soros is pulling all the strings he can, but bribing electors would be too blatant even for him.
As to saying Trump will lose, I, and several people here have posited that, are we in on it too?
In short, without ANY proof of bribery - it's a theory. With more than one person involved - it's a conspiracy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2016 2:21:07 GMT
@headlesshorseman , Nobody was surprised Chicago corrupted the '60 election, particularly Chicagoans. Just how is a "paid political announcement" a bribe? Soros didn't say anything about bribing anybody, and unless you have a listening device in his office, you can only guess what he's said. I have no doubt Soros is pulling all the strings he can, but bribing electors would be too blatant even for him. As to saying Trump will lose, I, and several people here have posited that, are we in on it too? In short, without ANY proof of bribery - it's a theory. With more than one person involved - it's a conspiracy.Tom, you have to read between the lines on this. What elector is going to be influenced by a, "paid political announcement," where the voter would not? The answer is none, unless there is bribery involved. Soros is not stupid, so he will not use the word bribery, but he has definitely said his, "paid political announcements," would influence the electors of the electoral college. I can't force you to see or acknowledge the truth, but it is there for those willing to look with an open mind. No, because you have not also spent multiple tens millions of dollars influencing politics in America and nations around the world as Soros has with his NGO's and foundations, nor have you spoken of doing the things Soros has spoken of doing, with others, openly in the main stream media. Tom, I know what a conspiracy is: Your opinions and those of others on this board are not secret, nor are the actual opinions and nebulous plans of George Soros, et. al., concerning the success or failure of Trump, a secret. Therefore, they can not be conspiracies. If this story of George Soros's bribery of electors is a theory, because there is no actual proof, beyond someone's words, then all the threads about Donald Trump's alleged (no criminal cases, no civil cases, no medical evidence, no photos, no DNA evidence, no corroborating witnesses) womanizing and assault are also conspiracy theories and should also be in Area 52-Conspiracy Theories. If this story of George Soros's bribery of electors is a conspiracy, because more than one person is involved in it, then all the threads about Donald Trump's alleged (Billy Bush, Donald Trump, female accusers) womanizing and assault are also conspiracy theories and should also be in Area 52-Conspiracy Theories.
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Oct 28, 2016 3:38:20 GMT
@headlesshorseman, I guess "reading between the lines" includes reading minds. I guess there's nothing too fantastic to believe if you want to believe the fantastic.
No, Trump's womanizing isn't a conspiracy, he's bragged of cheating on his wives several times. You don't have to read between the lines with him, just listen to what he outright says.
|
|
|
Post by sawmilljim on Oct 28, 2016 3:52:15 GMT
@headlesshorseman , I guess "reading between the lines" includes reading minds. I guess there's nothing too fantastic to believe if you want to believe the fantastic. No, Trump's womanizing isn't a conspiracy, he's bragged of cheating on his wives several times. You don't have to read between the lines with him, just listen to what he outright says. As Huckleberry said if people had wanted a preacher he would been the nominee . Many have skeletons in the closet some outright tell about them others just bump off anyone telling about them ,some before they talk.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2016 9:54:23 GMT
@headlesshorseman , I guess "reading between the lines" includes reading minds. I guess there's nothing too fantastic to believe if you want to believe the fantastic. No, Trump's womanizing isn't a conspiracy, he's bragged of cheating on his wives several times. You don't have to read between the lines with him, just listen to what he outright says. I'll answer the last part of your post first. Trump's alleged womanizing and bragging of cheating are just that, alleged and bragging. People brag all the time, but that certainly doesn't necessarily make it so. As to reading between lines, reading minds, and wanting to believe the fantastic, well, all you have to do is look around as your country is being stolen by coup d'état. Yes, There Is a Coup On in America
October 26, 2016 By Peggy Ryan Article: www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/yes_there_is_a_coup_on_in_america.html
|
|
|
Post by blackfeather on Oct 29, 2016 0:34:26 GMT
|
|