|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Oct 31, 2015 15:02:08 GMT
We had a thread on here not too long ago about the EPA arming "itself?" against threats of sudden attack by snail darters. Here's a little more in depth look at exactly what they're buying. Mein Gott! Just a little quick math tells me they could arm a Brigade (1/3 of an army division) with this kind of spending. And not just a few weapons. Open the Books found that the agency has spent millions of dollars over the last decade on guns, ammo, body armor, camouflage equipment, unmanned aircraft, amphibious assault ships, radar and night-vision gear, and other military-style weaponry and surveillance activities.
“We were shocked ourselves to find these kinds of pervasive expenditures at an agency that is supposed to be involved in clean air and clean water,” said Open the Books founder Adam Andrzejewski. “Some of these weapons are for full-scale military operations.”
Among the EPA’s purchases:
$1.4 million for “guns up to 300mm.” $380,000 for “ammunition.” $210,000 for “camouflage and other deceptive equipment.” $208,000 for “radar and night-vision equipment.” $31,000 for “armament training devices.”
dailysignal.com/2015/10/30/why-did-the-environmental-protection-agency-spend-1-4-million-on-guns/
Something is definitely not right here. In the article I found earlier, it said the EPA has a team of 200 military/security types on their payroll. They could easily arm over 4000! Although the the EPA employs around 15,000, there's no way they've got 4000 clerks, mid-managers, and engineers who moonlight as light infantry. The question should be, who are they arming? This is clearly a "straw purchase". You know, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
|
|
|
Post by Wanderer0101 on Oct 31, 2015 15:46:51 GMT
The huge question is what 'legitimate' reason does the EPA have to arm their personnel? Presumably they can call on armed law enforcement whenever they need them, though it's a little hard for me to imagine the circumstance.
|
|
|
Post by whereiwant2b on Oct 31, 2015 16:20:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ozarks Tom on Oct 31, 2015 17:58:00 GMT
From their sister sites listed across their banner it's definitely an environmental group. There are several legitimate law enforcement agencies, FBI, Marshalls, Secret Service, etc. that could easily accompany these "special agents" along with local law enforcement. The EPA rationale doesn't hold water.
|
|
|
Post by woolieface on Nov 2, 2015 0:11:43 GMT
We had a thread on here not too long ago about the EPA arming "itself?" against threats of sudden attack by snail darters. Here's a little more in depth look at exactly what they're buying. Mein Gott! Just a little quick math tells me they could arm a Brigade (1/3 of an army division) with this kind of spending. And not just a few weapons. Open the Books found that the agency has spent millions of dollars over the last decade on guns, ammo, body armor, camouflage equipment, unmanned aircraft, amphibious assault ships, radar and night-vision gear, and other military-style weaponry and surveillance activities.
“We were shocked ourselves to find these kinds of pervasive expenditures at an agency that is supposed to be involved in clean air and clean water,” said Open the Books founder Adam Andrzejewski. “Some of these weapons are for full-scale military operations.”
Among the EPA’s purchases:
$1.4 million for “guns up to 300mm.” $380,000 for “ammunition.” $210,000 for “camouflage and other deceptive equipment.” $208,000 for “radar and night-vision equipment.” $31,000 for “armament training devices.”
dailysignal.com/2015/10/30/why-did-the-environmental-protection-agency-spend-1-4-million-on-guns/
Something is definitely not right here. In the article I found earlier, it said the EPA has a team of 200 military/security types on their payroll. They could easily arm over 4000! Although the the EPA employs around 15,000, there's no way they've got 4000 clerks, mid-managers, and engineers who moonlight as light infantry. The question should be, who are they arming? This is clearly a "straw purchase". You know, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you. Something tells me that they're arming the people who will be coming on to private property to enforce present and future tyrannical environmental restrictions...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2015 0:51:07 GMT
Something very fishy here. If not to be used against fellow Americans then who are they arming?
|
|
riverdale
Junior Member
Middle of the Mitten
Posts: 66
|
Post by riverdale on Nov 2, 2015 10:48:52 GMT
This 1st thing a true American president should do is eliminate ALL these questionable quasi-LEO arms, and disarm them.
We know that will never happen.
|
|