|
Post by gapeach on Nov 17, 2015 1:22:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by paisley on Nov 17, 2015 3:02:04 GMT
Alaska governor..... wants the money to take them... his phone is ringing off the hook... the radio is only one for in 7 hours of call. Got to give it credit only one Obama worshipper held the position of say no is just being hateful to Obama.. ever single person... even staunch supports of the president ...but Charlie... said no... not safe.
The hot air over this subject here is warming it up here..
|
|
|
Post by gapeach on Nov 17, 2015 3:05:40 GMT
Alaska governor..... wants the money to take them... his phone is ringing off the hook... the radio is only one for in 7 hours of call. Got to give it credit only one Obama worshipper held the position of say no is just being hateful to Obama.. ever single person... even staunch supports of the president ...but Charlie... said no... not safe. The hot air over this subject here is warming it up here.. OMG, paisley, you just might have to move south.
|
|
|
Post by paisley on Nov 17, 2015 3:20:24 GMT
Sen. Dan Sullivan... working his magic. he, I guess understands that it is the duty to defend the nation..... not destroy it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2015 3:31:08 GMT
Now over half of the states (26) governors are stating they will refuse to accept the 'refugees'... www.cnn.com/2015/11/16/world/paris-attacks-syrian-refugees-backlash/Obama is having a "fit" over it. Only 1,500 Syrian refugees have been accepted into the United States since 2011, but the Obama administration announced in September that 10,000 Syrians will be allowed entry next year.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations said Monday, "Defeating ISIS involves projecting American ideals to the world. Governors who reject those fleeing war and persecution abandon our ideals and instead project our fears to the world."
Authority over admitting refugees to the country, though, rests with the federal government -- not with the states -- though individual states can make the acceptance process much more difficult, experts said.
American University law professor Stephen I. Vladeck put it this way: "Legally, states have no authority to do anything because the question of who should be allowed in this country is one that the Constitution commits to the federal government." But Vladeck noted that without the state's participation, the federal government would have a much more arduous task.
"So a state can't say it is legally objecting, but it can refuse to cooperate, which makes thing much more difficult."
THIS could be the catalyst that Obama is looking to hang his hat on....when the state's refuse to cowtow and bend to the feds will and demands, then the button will be pushed in which he could conceivably, declare martial law and bring troops out - whether our own or the U.N. is a toss-up; perhaps both? I'm willing to bet that he's got to do something in the next 10 months to set the stage. The end isn't that far off my friends....
|
|